Capability 05 · Equip the field
Field Training
Build learning and practice materials from the exact approved source set, with page- or slide-level excerpts attached to generated claims.
The problem¶
Training drafts can drift from their source material, omit safety context, or silently mix old documents into a new request. Review becomes slow when a learner, facilitator, or MLR reviewer cannot trace a message to an exact passage.
Objective¶
Turn one or more supplied, approved PDF or PPTX paths into a learning package, assessment, pre-session role-play kit, or post-session scorecard while retaining source-set isolation and exact page or slide excerpts.
How it helps¶
- Stops when any requested source path is missing, unreadable, or unsupported instead of rendering a partial set.
- Grounds messages, model answers, and approved responses through structured
SourceReferencerecords. - Validates and saves structured JSON plus self-contained interactive HTML for offline review and facilitation.
How the plugin works¶
Exact approved source set
Absolute PDF or PPTX paths plus a requested output type and name; every supplied file must validate.
Ingest, ground, and render
ingest_documentlist_documentssearch_contentget_document_pagerender_output
Grounded learning artifact
Schema-valid JSON and self-contained HTML for a learning package, assessment, role-play kit, or scorecard.
A three-step workflow¶
Lock the source set
Provide the exact approved PDF or PPTX paths and verify every document ID, page, and slide.
Draft from excerpts
Create learning or practice content while attaching each claim to a matching source passage.
Validate and render
Inspect sourcing, fair balance, schema validity, interactive behavior, and final rendered fidelity.
Sample input¶
The fictional YAML represents a path-first learning-package request and includes one simulated approved-source excerpt so the grounding relationship can be inspected. The named PDF is not distributed and the YAML is not a runtime source document; production ingestion supports approved PDF and PPTX files.
Interpreted sample output¶
The representative learning-module excerpt keeps benefit and safety context connected and cites the exact fictional sentence on page 3. Reviewers should compare that excerpt with the ingested page, then inspect the complete source set, message balance, and rendered artifact before field use.
Download representative output JSON
Business value indicators¶
| Indicator | What a business reviewer learns |
|---|---|
| Supplied versus ingested documents | Whether the full approved source set entered the request |
| Claims with exact source excerpts | Whether each message can be traced to a page or slide |
| Unsupported or inaccurate flags | Which statements need revision or removal |
| Safety and fair-balance coverage | Whether review should challenge an unbalanced learning story |
| Rendered-artifact QA exceptions | Whether content is hidden, clipped, stale, or interaction-dependent |
Boundaries and human review¶
Use only the exact approved source documents for the request. Generated learning and role-play materials remain drafts for qualified medical, legal, regulatory, learning, and accessibility review; they are not permission for field use. Review off-label risk, unsupported claims, fair balance, source-set isolation, exact excerpts, and final rendering. Every public-beta output must be validated after content changes.
Get started¶
Inspect the fictional source-to-message trace, then use the canonical pinned guide for supported file types, output schemas, path-first prompts, and renderer behavior.