Skip to content

Start with the business outcome

Open Pharma Plugins is a set of independently installable capabilities. Choose the narrowest workflow that supports the decision at hand, then connect artifacts only when their identifiers, provenance, and governance remain intact.

Outcome 01
Know the account

Prepare for an evidence-informed HCP or HCO conversation

Use HCP Intelligence to assemble a structured profile from public sources such as ORCID, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and selected web providers. The useful outcome is not a score: it is a reviewable account brief where claims carry sources and confidence.

  • Bring: an identified HCP or HCO, plus affiliation, specialty, or country to help disambiguate.
  • Review: identity match, source authority, incomplete coverage, and recency.
  • Decision supported: account preparation and research prioritisation—not automated targeting.
Outcome 02
Read the market

Create one evidence base for a landscape review

Use Competitive Intelligence to collect bounded public-source evidence across trials, regulatory records, publications, and configured news search. One immutable run can feed both a briefing and a timeline, reducing the risk that separate views silently use different evidence.

  • Bring: explicit drug or company identities and a defined monitoring question.
  • Review: source status, query scope, retrieval time, record count, and stated limitations.
  • Decision supported: landscape and launch-planning discussions—not a claim that no event occurred when coverage failed.
Outcome 03
Shape coverage

Compare territory choices before committing the field

Use Territory Alignment to model assignments, vacancies, new hires, overrides, and visit clusters while showing workload, travel, continuity, priority coverage, and review exceptions in a consolidated offline report.

  • Bring: governed HCP, representative, territory, and location data.
  • Review: unassigned accounts, manager overrides, employment rules, map-data exposure, and operational feasibility.
  • Decision supported: scenario comparison and route planning—not an automatic reorganisation.
Outcome 04
Plan engagement

Turn a governed universe into a constrained engagement plan

Use Next-Best-Engagement to recommend an HCP, channel, and assigned representative while applying explicit consent, capacity, minimum-gap, channel-diversity, and coverage rules.

  • Bring: an assigned HCP universe with consent and recent-interaction data appropriate to the use case.
  • Review: eligibility, unassigned reasons, channel permissions, stale inputs, and field practicality.
  • Decision supported: call-plan review and what-if comparison—not autonomous outreach.
Outcome 05
Equip the field

Build source-grounded learning and practice material

Use Field Training to turn supplied, approved PDF or PPTX documents into learning packages, assessments, role-play kits, or scorecards. Each generated claim and model answer is expected to retain a source reference.

  • Bring: the exact approved documents for this request.
  • Review: source-set isolation, verbatim excerpts, fair balance, unsupported or off-label content, and rendering.
  • Decision supported: training development and coaching—not permission for field use.
Outcome 06
Prepare materials

Package campaign drafts for qualified MLR review

Use Campaign Studio to preflight exact approved-claims and brand-kit inputs, then structure a brief, audience journey, message architecture, channel copy, rendered-file validation, and a content-addressed review package.

  • Bring: jurisdiction, indication, audience, objective, approved claims, brand components, and required safety content.
  • Review: claim support, fair balance, jurisdictional elements, asset fidelity, and current-input validation.
  • Decision supported: campaign development and review preparation—not regulatory approval or distribution.

Where capabilities connect

Connections are optional and should be explicit. Territory assignments can become the owned universe for an engagement plan. Source-grounded field material and claim-grounded campaign material can support a coordinated enablement cycle. Competitive and HCP evidence can inform discussion, but it does not become approved promotional content by crossing into another tool.

See the fictional example format →